MafiaInABox Game 7 - THE GREAT AVALANCHIAN WAR

random lynching will get us no where. We need to survive to win, remember?

Also, why didn;t Ansem fix this? He was the handsome minister of Internal affairs...

Fedaykin wrote:I agree with Weldar on Snake possibly being a dick,but he wouldn't screw with Sah in that way.

.......Snake would so do that....Just saying......

EDIT: Snake is a dick.

GreenArcher628 wrote: Snake is a dick.

GreenArcher was killed. She was a nobody





That was a joke, btw.

I think we found the culprit

Vote:SnakeInABox

jk,sorry,couldn't resist

The voting as of now

Smashbro: 1
SnakeInABox: 1
Fedaykin: 18

I get it,don't mess with the Big Kahoona

It's all a lie.

There is no mafia. Only Snake randomly choosing who dies each night. We're all townies.
Oh ho ho, I so got it. We'll just be lynching our own people. See, it's all a big philosophical statement about how we don't need an outside force to destroy ourselves. This shit is like Lord of the Flies all over again.
We are The Beast!

*modkilled for overanalysis*

Game 2 saw the mafia kill smashbro Night 0. It's certainly possible that they or another night-killer had the chance to strike pre-game. It's a question of game balance. If I was able to balance a double-godfather/SK, I have no doubt that Snake could balance something like this.
As I said before, I doubt he was just a suicidal townie; those don't usually die before the game begins, instead they die the first nightphase. If he had a role that demanded he died right away there's definitely more to it. Personally, one of the biggest things that bothered me Game 6 was the inactivity in the first day. Day 1 scared me into thinking people might not be very active, and Snake shared those fears. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Sah's death was done via RNG (or intentionally to combat his usual inactivity) to ensure we have something to talk about.

Also, if you decide to vote for nobody, say Vote:SnakeInABox instead of Vote:Nobody. He listed Fed's joke vote against himself in the current votes tally. Weldar and I talked once about a game he had played in which the players had to lynch the host to win, and as long as the host was alive there would be one death each night via RNG. If the host is evil, we might stop a nightkill, and if he was just fucking with us, those votes don't count anyways.

On a broader scale, whether we lynch or not, we should make sure we don't lynch someone random or instantly default to a no-lynch. Here's what my standpoint has always been: A day without a lynch only ever means anything if we can gather information out of it. Avoiding a random lynch should go without said at this point, but another of the worst things we can do are default instantly to a no-lynch, especially after we've already lost a townie, because that gives us no information at all. The only time we should go for a no-lynch is if by the end of the day we really don't have any good leads. Don't settle for a lynchless day so easily.

Q,he also listed 18 votes against me,I guess it's just his humour.But besides that,I agree with you sticking with the vote Snake thing.And that host being killable is kinda fucked up,who gets such ideas oO

And how can we gather info by a no-lynch?Last game,most people just said "Ok,no lynch,we're cool" You don't get much out of that.

Some times you get heat on someone and they crack, sometimes you see what people say and you find out how they feel. No lynches can help.

Also, I've seen a few games where you need to kill the host, so for now... Vote:Snakeinabox

Since it would not hurt us if we all did vote Snake.

VOTE:SnakeInABox

But if we do need to kill him would that just end the game?

Huh, what a notion.... Vote: SnakeInABox

every game that i havnt bandwagon voted, i've died.

Vote: SnakeInABox

td260 wrote:I'm inclined to kick things off with a random lynch. thin the herd a little.

Vote:TD260 For Suggesting to thin the town herd

td260 wrote:every game that i havnt bandwagon voted, i've died.

Vote: SnakeInABox

This is not actually a very good attitude to have. Bandwagoning in itself is not a bad thing. Going against a bandwagon built on solid a reason without providing a reason of your own will look suspicious yes but in a bandwagon like this which has little solid reasoning on it can't really harm you too much.

Weldar wrote:

td260 wrote:every game that i havnt bandwagon voted, i've died.

Vote: SnakeInABox

This is not actually a very good attitude to have. Bandwagoning in itself is not a bad thing. Going against a bandwagon built on solid a reason without providing a reason of your own will look suspicious yes but in a bandwagon like this which has little solid reasoning on it can't really harm you too much.

look. at this point, it's the first day. we have no proof. either we randomly lynch someone, (as I suggested earlier) In a high risk high rewards sort of move, or we lynch nobody, and let the mafia kill another townie. Or, We do this current bandwagon, and try to lunch the mod. If it works, we win. if not, it's a no lynch, which is what usually happens on the first day. Of the options that have been suggested, (namely, my gamble on a lynch, the no lynch, or the lynch-the-gamemod) The lynch-a-gamemod is the safest option, because, as i said, either it's a no lynch, or we win. (the "winning" part is based off of the theory proposed by the previous posters, of that there is no mafia, and the GM is the one killing people. If this is not true, and we lynch the mod, I have no idea what will happen)

[quote="td260"]In a high risk high rewards sort of move, or we lynch nobody, and let the mafia kill another townie. [quote]

So, you think the Mafia is behind Sah's death?

[quote="GreenArcher628"][quote="td260"]In a high risk high rewards sort of move, or we lynch nobody, and let the mafia kill another townie.

So, you think the Mafia is behind Sah's death?

sorry, awkward wording. I have no idea what killed sah. I said another townie because I was thinking that a dead person meant the night phase has passed, and the mafia had killed someone. >.>
Not used to having a kill night 0.

My argument still stands though. A standard No-Lynch will let the mafia kill somebody, but it's one dead townie, not two, which would most likely happen if we do a random lynch. (As i said, there's a chance we hit a mafia, but more likely it's a townie) If it's lynching SIAB, by the theory that SIAB is the killer, We win if we lynch him. If he's not the killer, then it's a no lynch, which is the safer of the two options.

td260 wrote: If it's lynching SIAB, by the theory that SIAB is the killer, We win if we lynch him. If he's not the killer, then it's a no lynch, which is the safer of the two options.

That is a very good Theory. I really wish Ida fucking thought of that.

Oh, and by the way, if everyone votes before halfway through the second day of the whole day phase, voting ends early. This rule stands throughout the entire game.

Early on, you don't have to worry about it. From the looks of it, you guys want me dead. But later on, you might want to think about how fast you count your vote.

From the looks of Relmitos, this phase ending early doesnt look like a problem.

Hmm sound logic so far I suppose. Vote:SnakeinABox