Where should Retro Studio go next?

Bugman on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:23 am

Now that Retro Studio managed to revive with great success one of Nintendo's biggest franchise... again, where should they go next?
Retro Studio is probably the best 2nd Party Studio Nintendo has in its possession (along with HAL and Sora LTD is coming along great, but Retro is probably the best western devs they have), so what Nintendo franchise Nintendo should give them the key to?

Maybe a F-Zero, a franchise we haven't seen since the GC days.
Or Star Fox, which is in the same situation has F-Zero, with 2 games on the GC and one on the DS.
Should they do a sequel to DKCR? Should they do a trilogy like they did for the Prime games?
Or should they go a little bigger with a western-made Zelda? I wouldn't say no to that, but since SS isn't even out yet, I don't think we would see that for a long time even if it would happen. But hey, Capcom made 4 Zelda games, why not Retro?

Discuss!

StuckInABox on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:28 am

Wtf is Retro?

¿Señior Poopy Water? on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:36 am

I think nintendo should stop trying to resuscitate dead franchises. Maybe they could come out with a new character for once. I mean I love the classics, but they're just beating dead horses.

StuckInABox on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:37 am

Mario, Kirby, and Link are not dead horses. I dont want some new asshole, I like the old guys.

¿Señior Poopy Water? on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:40 am

You're right, they are cows who's teets have long been sucked dry

DRTJR on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:42 am

everyone knows I like the 4 capcom LoZs but F-zero needs it more.

Bugman on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:42 am

SnakeInABox wrote:Wtf is Retro?

I hope you are kidding, otherwise you are living under a rock for the past 10 years.

Hekatommy Riagon on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:44 am

If they still make good games and those games fit that character. Why kill them off just to replace them with someone that is no doubt going to be less popular and or likable.

StuckInABox on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:49 am

BY2K wrote:
SnakeInABox wrote:Wtf is Retro?

I hope you are kidding, otherwise you are living under a rock for the past 10 years.

DRTJR on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:55 am

SnakeInABox wrote:
BY2K wrote:
SnakeInABox wrote:Wtf is Retro?

I hope you are kidding, otherwise you are living under a rock for the past 10 years.

there the dudes who made the prime games

StuckInABox on Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:57 am

Oh. Living under a rock? Come on, it's just metroid fucking prime. Big whoop.

Bugman on Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:05 am

Are you saying Metroid Prime, 2 and Corruption are bad games?

Outlaw on Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:07 am

Retro is a very talented developer. Nintendo should stop shoving old franchises on them. Not to say I am against making new games for old franchises, but with the talent Retro has they could make a pretty awesome NEW franchise.

StuckInABox on Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:12 am

I am saying I don't do Metroid. I never have, and never will.

Metroid Prime, while a good game, is just a very small part of the Nintendo vault. You shouldnt blame me for not knowing what Retro was.

smashbro on Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:25 am

StarFox. It's been awhile since a good one came out.

A western-made Zelda would is a cool idea too though.

Where should Retro Studio go next?

What franchise Retro Studio should be given the keys to?

Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?

Re: Where should Retro Studio go next?